Signal peptides that encourage skin to make more of its own structural proteins. Men in the same programme (n=39) saw about 10% depth and 30% density reduction.
Evidence library
Every number. Its source. Our grade.
What each ingredient has actually shown in people, with panel size and duration. Grade A: multiple peer-reviewed trials. Grade B: a manufacturer in-vivo study with a stated panel. Grade C: small, old or secondary-source evidence; we use the ingredient but do not lean on the number.
A neuro-peptide that softens the look of expression lines. The original study is small and a 2025 review notes inconsistent significance, so we keep the claim to "the appearance of expression lines" and nothing stronger.
A tetrapeptide tested specifically for under-eye puffiness. At 10% over 60 days (n=20) the effect was significant from day 14 and elasticity improved 30% by day 30.
Targets the blood-pigment build-up that gives vascular dark circles their colour. Does nothing for hollows or melanin-based circles, and we say so.
A collagen-supporting signal peptide. The percentages quoted around the web are secondary-source only, so we report the study design, not a number.
The most famous peptide in skincare and the least supplier-substantiated. The evidence is literature-based rather than a manufacturer datasheet, which is why Verglas does not rest its claim on it alone.
One of the best-evidenced cosmetic actives there is. We dose it at 4% in Verglas and 2% in Snowline, the range the literature actually tested, not the 10% arms race.
Skin-identical lipids. Decades of barrier science say the ratio matters more than the headline percentage.